Slate Stats › NFL › Injury impact
If Malachi Fields is out, who gets his targets?
The New York Giants room absorbs +0.47 receptions, and Malik Nabers takes the largest single share at +0.24. The work stays overwhelmingly inside the wide receiver room.
Where the work goes
Change in projected receptions for every other player in the offense. The bars are small on purpose — a vacated role is shared out, and any tool showing one replacement absorbing a whole target load is telling you something the data does not support.
Every player in the room
| Player | Catches now | If he sits | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malik Nabers WR · 68% snaps | 3.50 | 3.74 | +0.24 |
| Isaiah Likely TE · 67% snaps | 3.20 | 3.20 | +0.00 |
| Cam Skattebo RB · 66% snaps | 2.90 | 2.90 | +0.00 |
| Malachi Fields WR · 74% snaps | 2.30 | — | OUT |
| Darnell Mooney WR · 58% snaps | 1.70 | 1.93 | +0.23 |
| Devin Singletary RB · 31% snaps | 1.30 | 1.30 | +0.00 |
| Theo Johnson TE · 30% snaps | 0.90 | 0.90 | +0.00 |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. RB · 2% snaps | 0.70 | 0.70 | +0.00 |
| Chris Manhertz TE · 37% snaps | 0.50 | 0.50 | +0.00 |
What the data says happens
Measured across every regular-season game from 2018 onward, each beneficiary compared against his own trailing four-game form and net of what the same players do in weeks the room’s number one actually plays.
| Room | Receptions gained | n | t |
|---|---|---|---|
| Receivers | +0.584 | 1,537 | 11.16 |
| Tight ends | +0.175 | 1,080 | 3.33 |
| Backs | +0.113 | 1,011 | 2.00 |
The room total is predictable. Which player takes it is not. Every candidate predictor of who gains — pecking order, snap share, route depth, trailing targets — correlates at roughly r = 0.02. In any single week one player usually takes about 60% of what was vacated; it is simply not predictably the same one.
Malachi Fields’s full stats and usageSnap share, target share, game log and this week’s projection