Slate Stats › NFL › Teams

Chicago Bears

This is a top-heavy committee. Luther Burden III holds 25.0% of the targets, and the 12 tracked pass-catchers project for 22 receptions and 237 receiving yards in week 4.

Who owns the targets

Trailing target share, largest first. Target share reproduces at 0.92 between halves of a season, so this is a stable picture of the pecking order rather than a snapshot of one good game.

25%24%14%10%10%18%Luther Burden IIIKalif RaymondRome OdunzeColston LovelandD'Andre SwiftEveryone else

Receivers

PlayerSnap shareTarget shareProj. catchesProj. rec yardsIf he sits
Luther Burden III WR165%25.0%4.047who benefits
Kalif Raymond WR261%24.0%3.646who benefits
Rome Odunze WR366%14.2%3.545—
Jahdae Walker WR depth27%1.9%0.17—
Zavion Thomas WR depth3%1.5%0.71—
Kaden Davis WR depth13%0.0%0.51—

Tight ends

PlayerSnap shareTarget shareProj. catchesProj. rec yardsIf he sits
Colston Loveland TE186%9.8%3.329who benefits
Cole Kmet TE263%5.9%1.719who benefits
Sam Roush TE322%4.3%0.710—

Backs

PlayerSnap shareTarget shareProj. catchesProj. rec yardsIf he sits
D'Andre Swift RB162%9.8%2.320who benefits
Kyle Monangai RB238%4.8%1.511who benefits
Roschon Johnson RB31%0.0%0.1-1—

The ground game

Projected for 27 carries and 124 rushing yards, with D'Andre Swift taking 60% of the work. Carries per game is the second most repeatable thing a player has — 0.97 between halves of a season — so a backfield split holds up far better than a touchdown rate does.

PlayerCarriesRush ydsYds/carryAnytime TD
D'Andre Swift RB16.1754.6544%
Kyle Monangai RB10.6504.7018%
1611D'Andre SwiftKyle Monangai

Whose role has changed since last season

Snap share this season against last, for anyone who has moved at least six points. This is the input the model leans on hardest early in a year, because snap share is already reliable at 0.84 after two games while receptions manage 0.66.

Chicago Bears snap share changeKalif Raymond+24.437→61%Luther Burden I…+23.242→65%Colston Loveland+21.165→86%Jahdae Walker+7.619→27%Cole Kmet-7.871→63%Rome Odunze-19.986→66%points of snap share

Ranked by trailing target share, tie-broken on snap share · concentration measured as a Herfindahl index over the tracked room · projections as-of-week with no lookahead